Key Criticisms of Engineering Internship Duration: A Systematic Literature Review

  • Murugan Subramaniam , Nishantini Loganathan , Arikpo Sampson Venatius , Muhammad Khair Noordin

Abstract

Work-Ready-Engineer or Industrial-Ready-Engineer is the common term discussed among
employers in the industrial environment. Whereby, employers seek graduate engineers equipped
with both technical and non-technical skills. Therefore, institutions of higher learning around the
world are very much concerned about the employer’s requirement and graduate employment.
This is because of their noteworthy part in establishing and improving the employability abilities
of their students through the provision of certain programs, courses, workshops, industrial and
practical training. In this context, industrial training duration is really important to ensure that
engineering students have sufficient time to understand, absorb and learn the industrial
knowledge to meet the vision of employers. According to the Engineering Accreditation Council
Board of Engineers Malaysia (EAC, 2017), a minimum of 8 weeks is required to complete the
internship program. The objective of the study is to analyze the effectiveness of recent internship
duration and to recommend suitable internship duration that can support to meet work-readyengineer and increase the employability rate.

Published
2020-05-10
How to Cite
Murugan Subramaniam , Nishantini Loganathan , Arikpo Sampson Venatius , Muhammad Khair Noordin. (2020). Key Criticisms of Engineering Internship Duration: A Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(10s), 449 - 455. Retrieved from http://sersc.org/journals/index.php/IJAST/article/view/14449
Section
Articles